Skip to main content

Flores v. State

Citations

  • 574 So. 2d 1314
  • 1990 WL 257431

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s “failure to consistently badger the prosecution” to bring him to trial did not eliminate his speedy-trial claim
  • most of a six hundred ten day delay chargeable to the State where no reason for delay shown in the record
  • six hundred ten day delay a violation of the right to a speedy trial
  • most of a six hundred ten day delay chargeable to the State where no reason for delay shown in the record
  • no specific prejudice shown and no affirmative showing of prejudice necessary
  • six hundred ten day delay a violation of the right to a speedy trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Anderson and Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

93 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.