Skip to main content

Hull v. State

Citations

  • 687 So. 2d 708
  • 1996 WL 729725

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that review of judicial comment made during voir dire regarding presumption of innocence was barred for failure to object
  • holding statements that expert used to base opinion on admissible where not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted
  • holding statements that expert used to base opinion on admissible where not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted
  • \It is not improper for a prosecutor to comment that the defendant was lying when the contention is supported in the record.\
  • third Barker factor given less weight when defendant “did not request a speedy trial, but only moved to dismiss for a denial of a right to a speedy trial”
  • “Rule 703 allows an expert to base his opinion on the opinions of others which are not in evidence so long as experts in the field ordinarily rely on such opinions in forming their own opinions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Prather, P.J., and James L. Roberts, Jr., and Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.