D.C. Circuit· 5/25/1994
Florence Goldman v. August Bequai
Citations
- 19 F.3d 666
- 305 U.S. App. D.C. 227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejection of claimant’s symptom allegations is proper 20 when the claimant’s activities showed that she was “quite functional”
- “[T]here are rare cases where an affirmative defense, such as 20 immunity, may be so clear on the face of the complaint that dismissal may qualify as a strike for 21 failure to state a claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wald, Edwards, Buckley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonD.C. Circuit· 1998-09-22· cited 417×
- Joseph Dureiko, as Trustee, and Southern Pine Isle Corporation v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2000-04-14· cited 82×
- Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District of Columbia· 1998-05-19· cited 62×
- McWILLIAMS BALLARD v. BROADWAY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC.District of Columbia· 2009-07-07· cited 56×
- Witherspoon v. Philip Morris Inc.District of Columbia· 1997-05-02· cited 54×
- Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2007-10-25· cited 42×
- Capitol Services Management v. Vesta CorporationD.C. Circuit· 2019-08-13· cited 42×
- Cobell v. BabbittDistrict of Columbia· 1998-11-05· cited 39×
- James D. Nelson, Jr. v. American National Red Cross, James D. Nelson, Jr., Cross-Appellee v. American National Red CrossD.C. Circuit· 1994-06-28· cited 37×
- Himmelstein v. Comcast of the District, L.L.C.D.C. Circuit· 2012-12-10· cited 24×
- Intelect Corporation v. Cellco Partnership GpDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-05· cited 23×
- Athridge, Thomas v. Rivas, FranciscoD.C. Circuit· 2002-12-17· cited 20×
- Sage v. Broadcasting Publications, Inc.District of Columbia· 1998-03-10· cited 20×
- Williams v. Central Money Co.District of Columbia· 1997-07-17· cited 18×
- ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation (North America), Inc. v. National Railroad PassengerDistrict of Columbia· 1998-06-08· cited 17×
- CarrAmerica Realty Corp. v. KaidanowD.C. Circuit· 2003-03-07· cited 15×
- Jones v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-07-25· cited 13×
- Dentons US LLP v. Republic of GuineaDistrict of Columbia· 2016-09-25· cited 12×
- Mosby-Nickens v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2012-05-23· cited 11×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Glus v. Brooklyn Eastern District TerminalSupreme Court· 1959-04-20· cited 563×
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-08-21· cited 110×
- Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-02-06· cited 108×
- Roland Riddell v. Riddell Washington CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1989-02-03· cited 96×
- Interdonato v. InterdonatoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-02-24· cited 47×
- Winnie C. Byers v. William A. BurlesonD.C. Circuit· 1983-08-05· cited 44×
- David R. Williams v. Harold MordkofskyD.C. Circuit· 1990-04-17· cited 40×
- Robert Kropinski v. World Plan Executive Council--UsD.C. Circuit· 1988-08-05· cited 27×
- King v. Industrial Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-03-28· cited 26×
- Mr. Carl H. Alley v. Dodge HotelD.C. Circuit· 1977-02-02· cited 23×
- Property 10-F, Inc. v. Pack & Process, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1970-05-05· cited 23×
- Naa Dei Nikoi v. Attorney General of the United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1991-09-27· cited 19×
- Ernest J. Fontana v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.D.C. Circuit· 1966-08-04· cited 10×
- J. Benjamin Simmons, Caveatee v. Elsie M. Pinney, CaveatorsD.C. Circuit· 1967-03-24· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.