Skip to main content
· 5/5/1970

Property 10-F, Inc. v. Pack & Process, Inc.

Citations

  • 265 A.2d 290
  • 1970 D.C. App. LEXIS 278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant could assert a statute of limitations defense where plaintiff still had over two years to file suit after the lulling activity ceased

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hood, Chief Judge, and Kelly and Nebeker, Associate Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.