Skip to main content
· 4/21/2000

Fletcher v. Apfel

Citations

  • 210 F.3d 510
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 7234
  • 2000 WL 430901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that de novo review applies when, as here, the underlying reconsideration motion was “solely [one] to reconsider a judgment on its merits”
  • affirming judgment in favor of the 4 Commissioner where the claimant missed the statute of limitations by one day
  • affirming judgment in favor of Commissioner where the claimant missed the statute of 16 limitations by one day
  • affirming judgment in favor of Commissioner where 4 the claimant missed the statute of limitations by one day
  • affirming judgment in favor of Commissioner where 5 the claimant missed the statute of limitations by one day
  • affirming 2 summary judgment in favor of Commissioner because the complaint was filed one day late

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garwood, Wiener, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.