· 9/23/1991
Rene Ynclan Ynclan v. Department of the Air Force
Citations
- 943 F.2d 1388
- 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1290
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 22379
- 57 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,044
- 57 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 32
- 1991 WL 186366
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the “delay by the clerk in stamping a complaint “filed” due to the pendency of a motion to proceed IFP does not jeopardize the timeliness of the plaintiff’s commencement of suit.”
- “[A] delay by the clerk in stamping a complaint ‘filed’ due to the pendency of a motion to proceed IFP does not jeopardize the timeliness of the plaintiff’s commencement of suit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Politz, King, Jolly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.