Skip to main content
· 1/7/2010

Alberta Energy Partners v. Blast Energy Services, Inc. (In Re Blast Energy Services, Inc.)

Citations

  • 593 F.3d 418
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 371
  • 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • § 1127(b) is the sole means for modification of the plan of reorganization after it has been confirmed
  • “[I]f no stay has been obtained and the plan has been substantially consummated, the more likely the third prong indicates equitable mootness.”
  • order denying motion for rehearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jolly, Demoss, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.