· 1/7/2010
Alberta Energy Partners v. Blast Energy Services, Inc. (In Re Blast Energy Services, Inc.)
Citations
- 593 F.3d 418
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 371
- 52 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 156
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- § 1127(b) is the sole means for modification of the plan of reorganization after it has been confirmed
- “[I]f no stay has been obtained and the plan has been substantially consummated, the more likely the third prong indicates equitable mootness.”
- order denying motion for rehearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Demoss, Prado
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.