Akers v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's 3.190(b) motion should have been granted because the face of the information showed \that the crime charged was barred by the statute of limitations\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ali
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-06· cited 72×
• State v. Crawford
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-03-10· cited 52×
• State v. Kennedy
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 1999-06-08· cited 23×
• Fleming v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-13· cited 18×
• State v. Strand
  Utah Supreme Court· 1983-11-14· cited 14×
• State v. Kruelski
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-05-28· cited 14×
• Andrews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-24· cited 13×
• Pontius v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-05· cited 2×
• Studnicka v. Carlisle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-13· cited 2×
• State v. William Kennedy
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-12-01
• Blehm v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-09-16

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. King
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-07-31· cited 40×