Skip to main content

Fleck v. State

Citations

  • 956 So. 2d 548
  • 2007 WL 1484491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting State's argument that the court was justified in denying the defendant's request because of an attempt to delay proceedings where court made no findings that motions were improper attempts to delay
  • reversing and remanding for a new trial after the trial court failed to hold a Faretta hearing and requiring the trial court to allow the defendant to represent himself on remand should he again choose to do so
  • reversing and remanding for a new trial after the trial court failed to hold a Faretta hearing and requiring the trial court to allow the defendant to represent himself on remand should he again choose to do so
  • “[A] defendant does not need to possess the technical legal knowledge of an attorney before being permitted to proceed pro se.” (quoting Hill v. State, 688 So.2d 901, 905 (Fla.1996))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.