Smith v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a trial court need not \`allow a defendant to delay and continually frustrate his trial'\
• recognizing that a trial court need not “ ‘allow a defendant to delay and continually frustrate his .trial’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fleck v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-23· cited 8×
• Anthony Williams v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-04-29· cited 6×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Williford v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1984-10-09· cited 152×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-03-29· cited 82×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-28· cited 52×
• Amos v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-03-18· cited 14×
• Matthews v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-21· cited 12×
• State v. Roberts
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-05-23· cited 12×
• Haram v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-09-17· cited 6×
• Davis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-28· cited 2×