Tennis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a criminal defendant asserts the right to self-representation, \the trial court's failure to hold a Faretta hearing ... to determine whether [the defendant can] represent himself is per se reversible error\
• “Under our clear precedent, and that of the district courts of appeal, the trial court’s failure to hold a Faretta hearing in this case to determine whether Tennis could represent himself is per se reversible error.”
• “Under our clear precedent, and that of the district courts of appeal, the trial court's failure to hold a Faretta hearing in this case to determine whether Tennis could represent himself is per se reversible error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).