Skip to main content

Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 5419

Syllabus

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the judgment, finding issues raised barred by res judicata based on appellant's failure to challenge the calculation of gains and losses in prior QDROs, with no merit to appellant's claim that inclusion of identical language in a supplemental QDRO created a new right of appeal, not subject to the bar of res judicata.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.