Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/15/2024
Fitzgerald v. Fitzgerald
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5419
Syllabus
Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the judgment, finding issues raised barred by res judicata based on appellant's failure to challenge the calculation of gains and losses in prior QDROs, with no merit to appellant's claim that inclusion of identical language in a supplemental QDRO created a new right of appeal, not subject to the bar of res judicata.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hoyt v. HoytOhio Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 287×
- In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-06-19· cited 90×
- Tekamp v. TekampOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-17· cited 6×
- Enty v. EntyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-08· cited 5×
- Kalbaugh v. KalbaughOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-07-29· cited 5×
- Haddox v. HaddoxOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-09-30· cited 5×
- Saha v. SahaOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-31· cited 3×
- FitzGerald v. FitzGeraldOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-12· cited 2×
- Korfhage v. FitzgeraldOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-10· cited 1×
- Norton v. NortonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.