Haddox v. Haddox
Citations
- 197 N.E.3d 1014
- 2022 Ohio 3500
Syllabus
Appellant's arguments challenging the trial court's adoption of a DOPO drafted by her former spouse are barred by res judicata and appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, where appellant did not timely appeal the underlying divorce decree and the DOPO was drafted merely to implement the trial court's previous judgment that was not appealed by appellant.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chef Italiano Corp. v. Kent State Univ.Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-07-12· cited 682×
- Wilson v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2007-11-20· cited 64×
- Reeves v. ReevesOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-06-27· cited 6×
- Fiedler v. FiedlerOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-08-12· cited 2×
- Huston v. HustonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-25· cited 1×
Other cases named Haddox v. Haddox
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.