FitzGerald v. FitzGerald
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 751
Syllabus
In a divorce action, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in barring appellant from presenting witnesses or exhibits at trial, in its custody and child support determinations, in the unequal award of marital assets in favor of appellee, and in awarding attorney fees to appellee. Further, the court did not err in ordering the posting of a supersedeas bond pending appeal. Bias R.C. 3109.04 impute income Civ.R. 62.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court· 2002-05-15· cited 820×
- Kunkle v. KunkleOhio Supreme Court· 1990-05-09· cited 595×
- Rock v. CabralOhio Supreme Court· 1993-08-11· cited 520×
- Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-06· cited 482×
- Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-28· cited 286×
- Bowen v. BowenOhio Court of Appeals· 1999-02-09· cited 179×
- State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-09-02· cited 141×
- State v. DeanOhio Supreme Court· 2010-10-26· cited 115×
- Nakoff v. Fairview Gen. Hosp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-03-06· cited 103×
- Gardini v. MoyerOhio Supreme Court· 1991-08-21· cited 28×
- Cline v. Mtge. Electronic Registration Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-24· cited 25×
- Drummer v. DrummerOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-07-02· cited 19×
- O'Malley v. O'Malley (In Re Stucki)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-01-30· cited 2×
- In re Disqualification of YarbroughOhio Supreme Court· 2019-05-02· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.