Fitts v. Eberlin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that habeas petitioner’s claim that the photographic identification procedure was unduly suggestive was not a claim of actual innocence that would excuse the untimely filing of his habeas petition
• “Given that no new rule exists that applies to [the petitioner’s] case, [his] plea for equitable tolling ... must fail.”
• “Given that no new rule exists that applies to [the petitioner’s] case, [his] plea for equitable tolling ... must fail.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).