California Court of Appeal· 12/24/1982
Fisher v. Larsen
Citations
- 138 Cal. App. 3d 627
- 188 Cal. Rptr. 216
- 1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 2268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendants relied on document which they knew was prepared by a potentially biased informant without making any effort to verify the veracity of the document
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Work
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-04-11· cited 261×
- Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-11-19· cited 209×
- Evans v. UnkowCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-10-04· cited 122×
- Grewal v. JammuCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-01-11· cited 81×
- Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-06-20· cited 71×
- American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal· 1987-10-19· cited 65×
- Cooksey v. ALEXAKISCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2004-10-21· cited 65×
- Live Oak Publishing Co. v. CohaganCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-10-01· cited 60×
- Church of Scientology of California v. Michael J. FlynnNinth Circuit· 1984-10-03· cited 54×
- Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-02-22· cited 52×
- Aguimatang v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-09-25· cited 43×
- Barry v. Time, Inc.N.D. California· 1984-04-05· cited 40×
- Planned Protective Services, Inc. v. GortonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-04-06· cited 36×
- O'LASKEY v. SortinoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-10-02· cited 32×
- Nazar v. RodefferCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-08-18· cited 30×
- Mahoney v. Southland Mental Health Associates Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-08-24· cited 28×
- Grillo v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-05-24· cited 25×
- Osmond v. Ewap, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1984-03-28· cited 22×
- City of Santee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-02-25· cited 19×
- Tucci v. Guy Gannett Publishing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1983-08-08· cited 13×
Cites
34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 4,525×
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 2,076×
- Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court· 1967-10-09· cited 1,899×
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 1,418×
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court· 1979-04-18· cited 1,085×
- Greenbelt Cooperative Publishing Assn., Inc. v. BreslerSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 794×
- Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. TornilloSupreme Court· 1974-06-25· cited 685×
- Barry M. Goldwater v. Ralph Ginzburg, Warren Boroson, and Factmagazine, Inc.Second Circuit· 1969-07-18· cited 205×
- Gregory v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Supreme Court· 1976-07-23· cited 178×
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 167×
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-10-27· cited 160×
- Okun v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1981-06-15· cited 106×
- Good Government Group of Seal Beach, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-11-27· cited 105×
- Forsher v. BugliosiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 101×
- Chrysler Corp. v. TodorovichWyoming Supreme Court· 1978-06-22· cited 91×
- Slaughter v. FriedmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-08-23· cited 64×
- Dowell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-14· cited 59×
- Wayne Vandenburg, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Newsweek, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantFifth Circuit· 1975-02-12· cited 47×
- Scott v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1974-02-14· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.