Tenth Circuit· 8/22/2001

Fisher v. Gibson

Citations

262 F.3d 1135
2001 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4278
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18957
2001 WL 958747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that allegations of incompetency during a time that pre-dated the relevant period for equitable tolling did not warrant applying the doctrine
holding that federal habeas petitions “cannot be tolled for time spent in state post-conviction proceedings” when state “applications for post-conviction relief [are] not filed until after” the “end of the limitations period”
concluding that a Petitioner’s “[§ 2254] petitions cannot be tolled for time spent in state post-conviction proceedings because the applications for post-conviction relief were not filed until after … end of the limitations period”
stating that an evidentiary hearing is a “matter of discretion” in the § 2244 context
stating that an evidentiary hearing is a “matter of discretion” in the § 2244 context
stating that § 2254 “petitions cannot be tolled for time spent in state post-conviction proceedings” where petitioner’s State “applications for post-conviction relief were not filed until after ... the end of the [federal] limitations period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Porfilio, Owen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Fisher v. Gibson

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.