Skip to main content
· 8/9/2002

Woods v. Kearney

Citations

  • 215 F. Supp. 2d 458
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14891
  • 2002 WL 1845006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • date on petition is presumptive date of mailing and, thus, of filing
  • date on petition is presumptive date of mailing and, thus, of filing
  • date on petition is presumptive date of mailing and, thus, of filing
  • date on petition is presumptive date of mailing, and thus, of filing
  • date on petition is presumptive date of mailing and, thus, of filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farnan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.