Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 12/23/1977

Fisher Controls Co. v. Commonwealth

Citations

381 A.2d 1253
476 Pa. 119
1977 Pa. LEXIS 950

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

to establish a denial of equal protection in the application of a tax statute, there should be something that amounts to an intention, or the equivalent of fraudulent purpose, to disregard the fundamental principle of uniformity
“A taxpayer complaining that administration of a tax violates its right to be taxed uniformly with others in its class must demonstrate . . . discrimination in the application of the tax” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
“A taxpayer complaining that administration of a tax violates its right to be taxed uniformly with others in its class must demonstrate . . . discrimination in the application of the tax” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Packel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Fisher Controls Co. v. Commonwealth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Fisher Controls Co. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1976-03-31· cited 2×

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.