Supreme Court· 12/19/1938
Welch v. Henry
Citations
- 305 U.S. 134
- 59 S. Ct. 121
- 83 L. Ed. 87
- 1938 U.S. LEXIS 1115
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding retroactive imposition of tax despite the absence of advance notice of the legislation
- upholding retroactive imposition of tax despite the absence of advance notice of the legislation
- upholding retroactive imposition of tax despite the absence of advance notice of the legislation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone, Roberts, McReynolds, Butler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
349 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court· 1993-06-14· cited 1,427×
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1976-07-01· cited 1,262×
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1977-04-27· cited 1,245×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co.Supreme Court· 1984-06-18· cited 912×
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 720×
- McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 690×
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court· 1941-01-13· cited 574×
- United States v. CarltonSupreme Court· 1994-06-13· cited 295×
- United States v. Isidro Ubaldo-FigueroaNinth Circuit· 2004-04-07· cited 277×
- Hodel v. IrvingSupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 241×
- Norvell v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 239×
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2001-11-20· cited 188×
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County CollectorIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-05-03· cited 184×
- United States v. DarusmontSupreme Court· 1981-01-12· cited 179×
- General Motors Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals· 2010-10-28· cited 160×
- Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-07-28· cited 159×
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1972-07-27· cited 154×
- Louis F. Peick v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1983-12-19· cited 124×
- Neild v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 1940-01-15· cited 116×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 1,617×
- United States v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1926-01-11· cited 1,137×
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1916-01-24· cited 844×
- Nichols v. CoolidgeSupreme Court· 1927-05-31· cited 500×
- Blodgett v. HoldenSupreme Court· 1927-11-21· cited 432×
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court· 1924-05-26· cited 383×
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court· 1932-05-16· cited 336×
- United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 315×
- Milliken v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-03-02· cited 297×
- Billings v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1914-02-24· cited 284×
- Untermyer v. AndersonSupreme Court· 1928-04-09· cited 255×
- Lynch v. HornbySupreme Court· 1918-06-03· cited 225×
- Wilson v. NewSupreme Court· 1917-03-19· cited 203×
- Hecht v. MalleySupreme Court· 1924-05-12· cited 198×
- Coolidge v. LongSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 183×
- Colgate v. HarveySupreme Court· 1935-12-16· cited 178×
- Klein v. Board of Tax Supervisors of Jefferson Cty.Supreme Court· 1930-11-24· cited 171×
- Helvering v. Independent Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1934-05-21· cited 150×
- Phillip Wagner, Inc. v. LeserSupreme Court· 1915-11-29· cited 132×
- United States v. HudsonSupreme Court· 1937-01-11· cited 114×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.