Skip to main content
· 1/4/1961

Stilman v. Tax Review Board

Citations

  • 402 Pa. 492
  • 166 A.2d 661
  • 1961 Pa. LEXIS 385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prior error in interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient to establish a denial of constitutional rights
  • prior error in interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient to establish a denial of constitutional rights
  • prior error in interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient to establish a denial of constitutional rights
  • “Prior error by an administrative official when interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient, in itself, to constitute a violation of the rights of due process and equal protection of the laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Cohen, Bok, Eagen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.