· 1/4/1961
Stilman v. Tax Review Board
Citations
- 402 Pa. 492
- 166 A.2d 661
- 1961 Pa. LEXIS 385
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prior error in interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient to establish a denial of constitutional rights
- prior error in interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient to establish a denial of constitutional rights
- prior error in interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient to establish a denial of constitutional rights
- “Prior error by an administrative official when interpreting a valid tax statute is insufficient, in itself, to constitute a violation of the rights of due process and equal protection of the laws.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Bell, Musmanno, Cohen, Bok, Eagen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.