· 2/3/1977
Chard v. Galton
Citations
- 559 P.2d 1280
- 277 Or. 109
- 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1084
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a lawyer’s statement in a pre-litigation letter to the plaintiff’s insurer was absolutely privileged where it had some relation to the proposed litiga- tion
- holding that a lawyer’s statement in a pre-litigation letter to the plaintiff’s insurer was absolutely privileged where it had some relation to the proposed litiga- tion
- noting that the absolute privilege should apply liberally
- discussing absolute privilege for communications during judicial proceedings and reasons for it
- privilege applied to statements in letter from attorney to insurance company urging settlement of clients’ claims
- privilege applied to statements in letter from attorney to insurance company regarding settlement of clients’ claims
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Sloper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.