Skip to main content
· 2/3/1977

Chard v. Galton

Citations

  • 559 P.2d 1280
  • 277 Or. 109
  • 1977 Ore. LEXIS 1084

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a lawyer’s statement in a pre-litigation letter to the plaintiff’s insurer was absolutely privileged where it had some relation to the proposed litiga- tion
  • holding that a lawyer’s statement in a pre-litigation letter to the plaintiff’s insurer was absolutely privileged where it had some relation to the proposed litiga- tion
  • noting that the absolute privilege should apply liberally
  • discussing absolute privilege for communications during judicial proceedings and reasons for it
  • privilege applied to statements in letter from attorney to insurance company urging settlement of clients’ claims
  • privilege applied to statements in letter from attorney to insurance company regarding settlement of clients’ claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Holman, Tongue, Sloper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.