Skip to main content
· 11/2/2005

Files v. Exxonmobil Pension Plan

Citations

  • 428 F.3d 478
  • 36 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1005
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 23649
  • 2005 WL 2861988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a qualified domestic relations order may be pursued posthumously
  • \[T]he detailed QDRO requirements set forth in ERISA are devoid A-1386-19 11 of any requirement that a QDRO be in place before plan benefits reach pay status under the plan.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Fisher, Pollak

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.