Skip to main content
· 6/10/2015

Patricia Jones (formerly Akers) v. W. Va. Public Employees Retirement System, etc.

Citations

  • 235 W. Va. 602
  • 775 S.E.2d 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a legislative rule that became effective subsequent to the Board’s grant of disability retirement benefits was inapplicable
  • finding that the Board’s duty is “to determine whether the QDRO meets specific statutory criteria”
  • stating that because party’s proportional marital interest in retirement benefits had been established by the divorce decree, party could seek 3 enforcement of her right to the percentage posthumously
  • “A family court has the necessary authority to posthumously enforce, revise, modify, or amend a domestic relations order for the purpose of establishing such order as a qualified domestic relations order.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loughry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.