E.D. Pennsylvania· 7/3/1984
Fickinger v. C.I. Planning Corp.
Citations
- 103 F.R.D. 529
- 39 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1018
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15271
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant’s claim that plaintiff is subject to a unique reliance defense does not preclude certification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shapiro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Moskowitz v. LoppE.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-12-07· cited 71×
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.D. Colorado· 1993-10-08· cited 71×
- Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-12-02· cited 58×
- Gavron v. Blinder Robinson & Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-04-16· cited 34×
- Thomas v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-07-03· cited 30×
- Anderson v. Bank of South, N.A.M.D. Florida· 1987-11-16· cited 29×
- McMahon Books, Inc. v. Willow Grove AssociatesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-07-30· cited 28×
- Kriendler v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 1995-01-31· cited 27×
- Snider v. Upjohn Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-04-15· cited 26×
- U-Haul Co. of Alabama, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama· 2004-05-14· cited 23×
- Seidman v. American Mobile Systems, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1994-09-30· cited 23×
- In re Rent-Way Securities LitigationW.D. Pennsylvania· 2003-09-10· cited 22×
- Ettinger v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-07-26· cited 20×
- Rishcoff v. Commodity Fluctuations Systems, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1986-07-14· cited 19×
- Arsam Co. v. Salomon Bros.N.D. Ohio· 1992-03-04· cited 18×
- Rosen v. Fidelity Fixed Income TrustE.D. Pennsylvania· 1995-11-28· cited 9×
- Benevento v. Life USA Holding, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2000-01-13· cited 8×
- Rosenberg v. Digilog Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1985-07-31· cited 7×
- Stewart v. Associates Consumer Discount Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1998-10-27· cited 6×
- Gooch v. Life Investors InsuranceM.D. Tennessee· 2009-12-21· cited 4×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,751×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1975-02-25· cited 621×
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court· 1966-03-07· cited 375×
- SHARP, Stanley L. v. COOPERS & LYBRAND, AppellantThird Circuit· 1981-06-05· cited 225×
- Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Anaconda American Brass Co.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1968-01-23· cited 207×
- Rubylee Davis, in No. 73-1249. v. George W. Romney, Individually and in His Capacity as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, in No. 73-1420Third Circuit· 1974-01-28· cited 202×
- Lewis v. CurtisThird Circuit· 1982-03-03· cited 194×
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaS.D. New York· 1968-01-22· cited 172×
- Miller v. Mackey International, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1971-11-23· cited 78×
- Lamb v. United Security Life Co.S.D. Iowa· 1972-05-17· cited 57×
- Cohen v. Uniroyal, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-08-22· cited 54×
- Sley v. Jamaica Water & Utilities, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-12-12· cited 49×
- Dorfman v. First Boston Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1973-08-07· cited 45×
- Simon v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1977-01-26· cited 43×
- AAMCO Automatic Transmissions, Inc. v. TayloeE.D. Pennsylvania· 1975-04-18· cited 41×
- Fogel v. WolfgangS.D. New York· 1969-05-09· cited 40×
- Richardson v. Hamilton International Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-03-08· cited 32×
- Fischer v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.E.D. New York· 1976-09-29· cited 32×
- Fickinger v. C.I. Planning Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1982-12-30· cited 24×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.