· 6/16/2014
Fernando Ruiz v. Affinity Logistics Corporation
Citations
- 754 F.3d 1093
- 79 Cal. Comp. Cases 897
- 22 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1221
- 2014 WL 2695534
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 11123
- 164 Lab. Cas. (CCH) 61,488
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding right to control under California law where a delivery company controlled “‘every exquisite detail’ of the drivers’ appearance, including the ‘color of their socks’ and ‘the style of their hair’”
- reversing district court and finding delivery drivers were employees as a matter of law
- “[TJhe parties’ mutual termination provision is consistent with either an employer-employee or independent contractor relationship.”
- “Entitlement to the let- ter, without actual receipt of it, is sufficient to support federal jurisdiction.”
- where defendant did dictate such detail about appearance, 24 that fact favored finding employee status
- defendant exercised control of detail of drivers' work by requiring them to wear uniforms and prohibiting them from wearing earrings, displaying tattoos, or having certain facial hair
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Paez, Jones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.