United States v. $132,245.00 in U.S. Currency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the claimant has the burden of establishing that the forfeiture is grossly disproportional to the offense
• upholding forfeiture of $132,245 transported by defendant into the United States because his violation of the 10 PIMENTEL V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES bulk cash smuggling statute unlike the reporting statute, “constitute[d] a far greater harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).