Skip to main content
· 8/22/2006

JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations

Citations

  • 48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 563
  • 142 Cal. App. 4th 1046
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8522
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 12189
  • 71 Cal. Comp. Cases 1257
  • 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1362

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that delivery drivers were employees of courier service, despite the fact that “drivers set their own schedules”
  • holding that “[b]y obtaining the clients in need of the service and providing the workers to conduct it, [delivery company defendant] retained all necessary control over the operation as a whole”
  • holding, where JKH’s retention of “all necessary control over the operation as a whole” was, under Borello, “enough to find an employment relationship,” that no “single factor, either alone or in combination, mandate[d] a different result”
  • “[T]he functions performed by the drivers, pick-up and delivery of papers or packages and driving in between, did not require a high degree of skill.”
  • courier service drivers did not require a high level of skill
  • courier service drivers did not require a high level of skill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy, Elia, Bamattre-Manoukian

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.