E.D. Michigan· 8/25/2006

Ferensic v. Birkett

Citations

451 F. Supp. 2d 874
2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 60368
2006 WL 2473469

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

performing de novo review of unexhausted habeas claim because “it is easier to address the merits of Petitioner’s claim than to perform a procedural default analysis”
performing de novo review of unexhausted habeas claim because “it is easier to address the merits of Petitioner’s claim than to perform a procedural default analysis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tarnow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.