Veterans Claims· 8/16/2006
Jonathan L. Haas v. R. James Nicholson
Citations
- 20 Vet. App. 257
- 2006 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 748
- 2006 WL 2355588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[Statutory ambiguity is not an absolute conclusion, but is a case-by-case determination as to whether the language answers the particular question presented. Hence, statutory language that plainly answers one question may still be ambiguous when applied to another.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hagel, Moorman, Lance
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Haas v. PeakeFederal Circuit· 2008-05-08· cited 81×
- Nicholas Ribaudo v. R. James NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2007-01-09· cited 39×
- Nicholas Ribaudo v. R. James NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2007-04-13· cited 20×
- Robert H. Gray v. Robert A. McDonaldVeterans Claims· 2015-04-23· cited 19×
- George W. Breniser v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2011-09-19· cited 14×
- American Legion v. NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2007-01-05· cited 14×
- Vola M. Brown v. R. James NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2007-05-31· cited 3×
- Haas v. Peake [Petition for Rehearing]Federal Circuit· 2008-10-09
- Nicholas Ribaudo v. James B. PeakeVeterans Claims· 2008-11-17
- Jonathan L. Haas v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2009-03-10
- Douglas A. Constantine v. Denis McDonoughVeterans Claims· 2022-01-14
- Ribaudo v. NicholsonVeterans Claims· 2007-01-26
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court· 1984-03-21· cited 7,642×
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 4,825×
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court· 1944-12-04· cited 4,567×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 1997-02-19· cited 2,686×
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-12-03· cited 2,566×
- Kutscherousky v. WestVeterans Claims· 1999-05-04· cited 2,049×
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 1,608×
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court· 1945-06-04· cited 1,565×
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,381×
- Barnhart v. WaltonSupreme Court· 2002-03-27· cited 1,238×
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1994-12-12· cited 1,044×
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 867×
- Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1981-04-21· cited 843×
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court· 1991-12-16· cited 703×
- Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court· 1977-06-20· cited 693×
- Good Samaritan Hospital v. ShalalaSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 532×
- Walters v. National Assn. of Radiation SurvivorsSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 527×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.