Skip to main content
· 10/31/1986

Feldt v. Union Insurance

Citations

  • 726 P.2d 1341
  • 240 Kan. 108
  • 1986 Kan. LEXIS 408

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that K.S.A 40-3118(b) does not mandate the insurer to provide proof of actual receipt by the insured
  • interpreting automobile liability insurance statute that requires only mailing of notice
  • interpreting automobile liability insurance statute that requires only mailing of notice
  • interpreting automobile liability insurance statute that requires only mailing of notice
  • “It is obvious the legislature chose to reject the common-law [and minority] rule.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Herd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.