· 10/31/1986
Feldt v. Union Insurance
Citations
- 726 P.2d 1341
- 240 Kan. 108
- 1986 Kan. LEXIS 408
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that K.S.A 40-3118(b) does not mandate the insurer to provide proof of actual receipt by the insured
- interpreting automobile liability insurance statute that requires only mailing of notice
- interpreting automobile liability insurance statute that requires only mailing of notice
- interpreting automobile liability insurance statute that requires only mailing of notice
- “It is obvious the legislature chose to reject the common-law [and minority] rule.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herd
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.