Bell v. Patrons Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court should not strain to create ambiguity
• noting that the court should not strain to create ambiguity
• noting that the court should not strain to create ambiguity
• noting that the court should not strain to create ambiguity
• where policy provided that it could be cancelled by mailing notice to the named insured, court found that proof of mailing was sufficient; contract unambiguously required only mailing
• where policy provided that it could be can-celled by mailing notice to the named insured, court found that proof of mailing was sufficient; contract unambiguously required only mailing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).