Skip to main content
· 3/12/1993

Orlovetz v. Day & Zimmerman, Inc.

Citations

  • 848 P.2d 463
  • 18 Kan. App. 2d 142
  • 1993 Kan. App. LEXIS 26

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a Kansas law wrongful termination claim because “such remedy must have been available in Kansas at the time of the creation of the federal enclave where plaintiff worked”
  • only federal law and such Kansas law as was in effect at the time of cession and not in conflict with federal law or as is subsequently enacted and specifically adopted and made applicable by Congress apply to activities and operations within the enclave

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Rulon, Bullock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.