Feemster v. BSA Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting HUD position that statute imposes “requirement to allow families receiving enhanced vouchers who elect to remain do so as long as the property remains a rental property, unless the owner has just cause for eviction”
• adopting HUD position that statute imposes “requirement to allow families receiving enhanced vouchers who elect to remain do so as long as the property remains a rental property, unless the owner has just cause for eviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Park Village Apartment Tenants Ass'n v. Mortimer Howard Trust
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-02-25· cited 126×
• Blodgett v. University Club
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-08-09· cited 74×
• Burbank Apartments Tenant Association v. Kargman
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2016-04-13· cited 24×
• Nautilus Insurance v. BSA Ltd. Partnership
  D. Maryland· 2009-03-10· cited 20×
• Feemster v. BSA LTD. PARTNERSHIP
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-11-14· cited 16×
• Parham v. Cih Properties, Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2015-12-09· cited 4×
• Theodore Hayes v. Philip Harvey
  Third Circuit· 2017-10-18· cited 3×

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of Catrett
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
• Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
• McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
• Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
• Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-01· cited 3,836×
• Ross J. Laningham v. United States Navy
  D.C. Circuit· 1987-03-17· cited 1,192×
• Cones, Kenneth L. v. Shalala, Donna E.
  D.C. Circuit· 2000-01-04· cited 276×
• Lawrence D. Mungin v. Katten Muchin & Zavis, A/K/A Katten Muchin Zavis & Weitzman, F/d/b/a Katten Muchin Zavis & Dombroff
  D.C. Circuit· 1997-07-08· cited 238×
• Michael D. Bayer v. United States Department of the Treasury
  D.C. Circuit· 1992-02-21· cited 184×
• BP America Production Co. Ex Rel. Amoco Production Co. v. Burton
  Supreme Court· 2006-12-11· cited 179×
• Hopkins v. Women's Division, General Board of Global Ministries
  District of Columbia· 2002-12-12· cited 179×
• Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Alton Packaging Corp.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1990-05-18· cited 152×
• Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-02-27· cited 152×
• Diamond v. Davis
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-02-20· cited 136×
• Miko v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-08-20· cited 116×
• Howard v. Riggs National Bank
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-07-14· cited 108×
• Mendes v. Johnson
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-06-13· cited 93×
• Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-10-12· cited 73×
• AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of Orange
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-07-10· cited 66×