Blodgett v. University Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs could not establish a claim of DCHRA discrimination for “political affiliation” by focusing on “political reasons” or “politics generally”
• “[A] member [of a social club] facing discipline is not entitled to the same type of process afforded under our civil and criminal justice systems.”
• “SGF is effectively admitting it discriminates against all [women presenting with a partner] based on source of income.”
• “The definition the [D.C.] Council crafted demonstrates that it intended the prohibition against ‘source of income’ discrimination to have a significant reach.”
• “good faith” a required element of the common interest privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).