Fauvergue v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that joinder was impracticable with a proposed class of 150 property owners
• “Plaintiffs have satisfied their burden in proving typicality under RCFC 23(a)(3
• “The ability to use joinder does not preclude certification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Fauvergue v. United States

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Fauvergue v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2008-12-11· cited 6×
• Fauvergue v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2010-05-03