M & J Coal Company and Monongah Development Company v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing mine owner’s right to mine but conditioning right on not endangering public health and safety
• stating that the court only proceeds to the second step in a takings analysis “if the claimant can establish the existence of [a property] interest”
• stating that if a claimant can establish an interest in property, “the court must then determine whether the governmental action at issue constituted a compensable taking of that [interest]”
• stating that if a claimant can establish an interest in property, “the court must then determine whether the governmental action at issue constituted a compensable taking of that ‘stick’ ”
• analyzing whether “interest was a ‘stick in the bundle of property rights’ acquired by the owner”
• analyzing whether “interest was a ‘stick in the bundle of property rights’ acquired by the owner”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).