Skip to main content
· 12/22/1999

Fausel v. JRJ Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 603 N.W.2d 612
  • 1999 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 312
  • 1999 WL 1242578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding interpretation is a process of determining meaning of contract terms while construction is a process of determining legal effect of such terms
  • holding interpretation is a process of determining meaning of contract terms while construction is a process of determining legal effect of such terms
  • noting that interpretation is “a process for determining the meaning of words in a contract” while construction is “a process of determining the legal effect of such words.”
  • stating 7 interpretation is process of determining meaning of contract terms while construction is process of determining legal effect of such terms
  • applying sections 202 and 212 to the interpretation of contract terms
  • applying sections 202 and 212 to the interpretation of contract terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Lavorato, Snell, Cady, Harris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.