Skip to main content
· 4/14/2006

Passehl Estate v. Passehl

Citations

  • 712 N.W.2d 408
  • 2006 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 53
  • 2006 WL 958576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a written contract may be modified by a subsequent oral contract
  • noting that while a court’s rulings on evidentiary objections is an important test of whether an action was tried in law or equity, it is not dispositive
  • noting that while a court’s rulings on evidentiary objections is an important test of whether an action was tried in law or equity, it is not dispositive
  • concluding minor evidentiary objections and rulings by the district court that did not have a significant effect on the proceeding did not change the proceeding from equity to at law
  • noting when “no one claims the trial court improperly excluded evidence, the trial court’s ruling on objections does not prevent a de novo review.”
  • keeping these rules in mind when considering the language of an agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Streit

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.