· 4/14/2006
Passehl Estate v. Passehl
Citations
- 712 N.W.2d 408
- 2006 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 53
- 2006 WL 958576
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a written contract may be modified by a subsequent oral contract
- noting that while a court’s rulings on evidentiary objections is an important test of whether an action was tried in law or equity, it is not dispositive
- noting that while a court’s rulings on evidentiary objections is an important test of whether an action was tried in law or equity, it is not dispositive
- concluding minor evidentiary objections and rulings by the district court that did not have a significant effect on the proceeding did not change the proceeding from equity to at law
- noting when “no one claims the trial court improperly excluded evidence, the trial court’s ruling on objections does not prevent a de novo review.”
- keeping these rules in mind when considering the language of an agreement
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Streit
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.