Skip to main content
· 2/14/2001

Walsh v. Nelson

Citations

  • 622 N.W.2d 499
  • 2001 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 24
  • 2001 WL 125094

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting “the determination of the parties’ intent is a question of fact” (citation omitted)
  • explaining language is not ambiguous “merely because the parties disagree about its meaning”
  • the cardinal rule of contract interpretation is to determine what the intent of the parties was at the time they entered into the contract
  • “The primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine the parties’ intentions at the time they executed the contract.”
  • the cardinal rule of contract interpretation is to determine what the intent of the parties was at the time they entered into the contract
  • “The primary goal of contract interpretation is to determine the parties’ intentions at the time they executed the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.