Farrior v. Farrior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that an asset may retain its separate identity even after the income derived from that asset is used to maintain or raise the marital standard of living

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Farrior v. Farrior
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-24· cited 20×
• Grieco v. Grieco
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-13· cited 10×
• Doerr v. Doerr
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-28· cited 6×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stainback v. Stainback
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-09-04· cited 64×
• Woodard v. Woodard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-31· cited 36×
• Amato v. Amato
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-15· cited 16×
• Adams v. Adams
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-02· cited 15×
• Walser v. Walser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-07· cited 12×
• Claughton v. Claughton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-14· cited 7×
• Crews v. Crews
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-12-22· cited 3×