Doerr v. Doerr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in classifying the husband's General Electric stock as marital because the husband inherited the stock during the marriage, the stock grew by passive appreciation, and the wife did nothing to enhance its value

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Grieco v. Grieco
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-01-13· cited 10×
• Tate v. Tate
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-15· cited 4×
• Jessee v. Jessee
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-08· cited 2×
• DAVID A. STREET v. ELYSSA STREET
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-09-30
• Krakower v. Krakower
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-19
• ROSA H. NARANJO v. FREDDY RAUL OCHOA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-07-05

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Farrior v. Farrior
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-24· cited 20×
• Johnson v. Johnson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-02-15· cited 17×
• Dal Ponte v. Dal Ponte
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-28· cited 8×
• Walton v. Walton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-28· cited 7×
• Farrior v. Farrior
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-12· cited 5×
• Osborne v. Osborne
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-23· cited 2×