· 10/10/1952
Farrar v. Hood
Citations
- 249 P.2d 759
- 56 N.M. 724
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- findings of fact supported by substantial evidence are the facts upon which case is to be decided on appeal
- as a matter of law, laches barred claim to quiet title to mineral interests where there was showing of prejudicial delay
- “The language of the statute, its subject matter and the purpose to be accomplished in its enactment, are matters of consideration in determining whether a contract is void or voidable.”
- general rule that contracts in violation of statute prescribing penalties are void
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Compton, Sadler, McGhee, Coors, Lujan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.