Skip to main content
· 10/10/1952

Farrar v. Hood

Citations

  • 249 P.2d 759
  • 56 N.M. 724

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • findings of fact supported by substantial evidence are the facts upon which case is to be decided on appeal
  • as a matter of law, laches barred claim to quiet title to mineral interests where there was showing of prejudicial delay
  • “The language of the statute, its subject matter and the purpose to be accomplished in its enactment, are matters of consideration in determining whether a contract is void or voidable.”
  • general rule that contracts in violation of statute prescribing penalties are void

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Compton, Sadler, McGhee, Coors, Lujan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.