Skip to main content
· 1/10/1876

Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. Marbury

Citations

  • 91 U.S. 587
  • 23 L. Ed. 328
  • 1875 U.S. LEXIS 1413

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing the traditional ability of the law to regulate fiduciary relationships as a doctrine founded on “the soundest morality”
  • noting “many instances in which two phrases with the like conjunction between them have been used to designate the same thing,” a construction “obviously done to make clear and certain the meaning of the legislature, and to leave no room for doubt upon, the subject”
  • noting “many instances in which two phrases with the like conjunction between them have been used to designate the same thing,” a construction “obviously done to make clear and certain the meaning of the legislature, and to leave no room for doubt upon the subject”
  • “The law is clear that a corporate officer and director has a fiduciary duty to the corporation itself as well as the stockholders in general.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.