Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 7/29/2004

Fagan v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.

Citations

  • 356 F. Supp. 2d 198
  • 56 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 528
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15944
  • 2004 WL 3186786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that plaintiff’s allegations “that the packaging used by [defendant] for the [medicine] was not tamper-resistant enough” “assert[ed] liability based upon design defect”
  • noting that, “since all of the claims against [defendant] are dismissed, the plaintiffs’ punitive damages claims against it are dismissed as well”
  • “Under New York law, the common law right to indemnification ‘arises when one party is compelled to pay for the wrong of another.”
  • “a manufacturer does not have a duty to anticipate and prevent criminal conduct by third parties, or to design its product in such a way as to anticipate and frustrate criminal tampering.”
  • “If CVS ProCare is found to be liable to plaintiff for negligence, it would not be entitled to common law indemnification against ABC, as each party would be independently liable to plaintiff for its own negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feuerstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Fagan v. AmerisourceBergen Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.