E.D. New York· 4/20/2009

Mathis v. United Homes, LLC

Citations

607 F. Supp. 2d 411
2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33355
2009 WL 1039880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Section 15-108 is designed to “assur[e] that a non[-]settling defendant does not pay more than [his] equitable share”
concluding that there is no federal right to contribution and/or indemnity under the FHA
noting that owners’ claims for contribution “could be founded on every state law cause of action asserted by the plaintiffs,” including violations of NYSHRL
explaining that, “in determining the adequacy of the [] Defendants’ [] cross-claims, the court shall consider the allegations set forth in the cross-claims and the plaintiffs’ complaints, which [were] integral to the cross-claims”
explaining that, “in determining the adequacy of the [] Defendants’ [] cross-claims, the court shall consider the allegations set forth in the cross-claims and the plaintiffs’ complaints, which [were] integral to the cross-claims”
stating that “section 1988 is a choice of law provision, nothing more.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matsumoto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

77 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.