Skip to main content
· 5/9/1986

Exxon Corp., USA v. Schoene

Citations

  • 508 A.2d 142
  • 67 Md. App. 412
  • 1986 Md. App. LEXIS 317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for a new trial where evidence existed in the record that the conditional privilege was abused
  • recovery allowed for loss of consortium resulting from slander to the spouse
  • loss of consortium appropriate though husband suffered no physical harm in defamation action
  • citing Jacron, 276 Md. at 600, 350 A.2d 688

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moylan, Bloom, Karwacki

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.