· 5/9/1986
Exxon Corp., USA v. Schoene
Citations
- 508 A.2d 142
- 67 Md. App. 412
- 1986 Md. App. LEXIS 317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for a new trial where evidence existed in the record that the conditional privilege was abused
- recovery allowed for loss of consortium resulting from slander to the spouse
- loss of consortium appropriate though husband suffered no physical harm in defamation action
- citing Jacron, 276 Md. at 600, 350 A.2d 688
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moylan, Bloom, Karwacki
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.