Skip to main content
· 7/13/1978

Marchesi v. Franchino

Citations

  • 387 A.2d 1129
  • 283 Md. 131
  • 1978 Md. LEXIS 412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defamatory statements by an employee to a manager about another employee could be protected by conditional privilege
  • adopting the New York Times standard of malice to defeat claims of a conditional privilege defense in cases of private defamation
  • adopting the New York Times standard of malice to defeat claims of a conditional privilege defense in cases of private defamation
  • referring to Comment, The Maryland Court of Appeals: State Defamation Law in the Wake of Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. 36 Md. L.Rev. 622, 647 n. 161 (1977)
  • knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for truth is the standard of malice required to defeat the defense of conditional privilege
  • “actual malice” to defeat Maryland privilege is the same as “actual malice” to defeat First Amendment privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy, C.J., and Smith, Digges, Levine, Eldridge, Orth and Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.