Sixth Circuit· 5/23/2013
Exact Software North America v. Infocon Systems, Inc.
Citations
- 718 F.3d 535
- 2013 WL 2248978
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 10384
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that § 2255 remedy “has been found to be ‘inadequate or ineffective’ only in ‘extremely limited circumstances’ ” (quoting Caravalho v. Pugh, 177 F.3d 1177, 1178 (10th Cir. 1999))
- action to enforce attorney’s lien for client’s unpaid legal fees was equitable action for which no jury-trial right existed
- discussing this concept as “supplemental” jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gilman, Rogers, Sutton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Elizabeth Clemons v. Norton Healthcare Inc. Retirement PlanSixth Circuit· 2018-05-10· cited 57×
- Law Offices of David Efron v. Matthews & Fullmer Law FirmFirst Circuit· 2015-04-01· cited 35×
- Autumn Wind Lending, LLC v. John SiegelSixth Circuit· 2024-02-08· cited 7×
- Waite, Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Co. v. DavisS.D. Ohio· 2015-04-15· cited 3×
- Jonathan Moses v. City of Perry, Mich.Sixth Circuit· 2024-01-04· cited 3×
- Noble Energy, Inc. v. JewellDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-08
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court· 1994-05-16· cited 12,961×
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2005-06-23· cited 2,717×
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 2,475×
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court· 1989-06-23· cited 1,582×
- Lincoln Property Co. v. RocheSupreme Court· 2005-11-29· cited 1,211×
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 708×
- Simler v. ConnerSupreme Court· 1963-02-18· cited 454×
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court· 1993-04-05· cited 368×
- Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.Supreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 365×
- Barnes v. AlexanderSupreme Court· 1914-01-12· cited 171×
- Re/max International, Inc., Re/max Northeast Ohio Limited Partnership, Intervenors-Appellees v. Realty One, Inc., Smythe, Cramer CompanySixth Circuit· 2001-11-09· cited 129×
- Bernard Damsky, Olga Damsky and Henry Birns v. Honorable Joseph C. Zavatt, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1961-04-03· cited 112×
- Wylie v. CoxeSupreme Court· 1854-02-16· cited 95×
- Joseph P. Jenkins v. Honorable Zita L. Weinshienk, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of ColoradoTenth Circuit· 1982-02-12· cited 87×
- Griffin v. LeeFifth Circuit· 2010-09-23· cited 56×
- Green v. NeversSixth Circuit· 1997-04-29· cited 55×
- Hoffman v. McClellandSupreme Court· 1924-04-21· cited 38×
- Woralak Kalyawongsa Udo Liell, Philip P. Durand E. Michael Morris, Attorneys-Appellees v. Margaret Jean MoffettSixth Circuit· 1997-01-23· cited 36×
- Novinger v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co.Third Circuit· 1987-01-15· cited 35×
- Woodbury v. Andrew Jergens Co.Second Circuit· 1934-02-19· cited 34×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.