Skip to main content
· 2/12/1982

Joseph P. Jenkins v. Honorable Zita L. Weinshienk, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado

Citations

  • 670 F.2d 915
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 21860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[ajn exception [to asserting an attorneys’ lien] is also recognized when the client is financially unable to post a bond or pay....”
  • “If [the third party] needs something in the [attorney’s] file to prove his case [against the debtor client], he can get it by discovery or subpoena notwithstanding the attorney’s 15 retaining lien.”
  • “Ancillary jurisdiction rests on the premise that a federal court acquires jurisdiction of a case or controversy in its entirety. Incident to the disposition of the principal issues before it, a court may decide collateral matters necessary to render complete justice.”
  • “Ancillary jurisdiction rests on the premise that a federal court acquires jurisdiction of a case or controversy in its entirety. Incident to the disposition of the principal issues before it, a court may decide collateral mat- ters necessary to render complete justice.”
  • discussing exceptions to retaining lien under New York law
  • “If the only interests at stake . . . were those of the attorney and his . . . former clients, the case would present no problem; the lien would be allowed to stand. But also involved is [the third party’s] interest . . . in a speedy resolution of his claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barrett, McKay, Logan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.